Discover more from Happy AF with Phil Gerbyshak
Leveraging the Zeigarnik Effect
My Journey in Writing 7 Books and 3,500 Articles
The human mind is a fascinating labyrinth of cognitive phenomena, one of which is the Zeigarnik Effect. Named after psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik, the theory postulates that our brain remembers incomplete tasks better than it does completed ones. Think of it as your mind's way of nagging you to finish what you started. We've all been there—whether it's the half-done laundry or the unfinished project at work; our minds seem to hold onto them until they're complete. But what if I told you that this very principle has been a cornerstone in my literary journey? Here's how I've utilized the Zeigarnik Effect to write seven books and over 3,500 articles.
Recognizing the Phenomenon
The first step in employing the Zeigarnik Effect was, of course, becoming aware of it. In the whirlwind of everyday obligations, it's easy to brush aside unfinished tasks as mere laziness or procrastination. But understanding that the mind is more inclined to focus on incomplete tasks gave me a powerful tool to harness my productivity, particularly when it came to writing.
Turning It Into a System
After recognizing the power of the Zeigarnik Effect, I sought to integrate it into a system that could aid my writing endeavors. How? By deliberately leaving my work unfinished. Now, I know what you're thinking: "Isn't the whole point to complete tasks?" Yes, but the key is in how you define "completion."
When writing, especially for a long-form project like a book, completion isn't arriving at the end but rather achieving a series of smaller milestones along the way. I've learned to halt my writing at crucial points intentionally, be it mid-paragraph, or even mid-sentence. This creates a mental itch, a sort of cognitive bookmark that urges me to come back and finish what I started. My mind keeps nudging me, almost to the point of distraction, until I sit down and write again.
You might be wondering, "Well, that sounds good in theory, but does it actually work?" I can say with certainty that it does. Over the years, I've written seven books and a whopping 3,500 articles. Let's put this into perspective: the average non-fiction book can range between 40,000 to 80,000 words. Doing the math, that's well over half a million words for the books alone, not to mention the articles. The Zeigarnik Effect has not just been a theoretical concept for me; it's been an applied practice that has massively scaled my output.
While this strategy has been transformative, it's not without its challenges. Balancing multiple unfinished tasks can lead to cognitive clutter, making it harder to prioritize. Furthermore, in a deadline-driven industry, it's tempting to rush to completion just to tick off boxes. To combat this, I've employed a mix of task-management tools and discipline to maintain a laser focus. After all, the Zeigarnik Effect is not a standalone solution; it's a cog in a larger productivity machine.
The Zeigarnik Effect is more than just an interesting cognitive phenomenon; it's a practical, effective tool for achieving goals. By understanding how my brain naturally operates, I've been able to significantly elevate my productivity in the field of writing. While I have been blessed to publish seven books and over 3,500 articles, the journey doesn't stop here. As long as there are stories to tell, insights to share, and tasks to complete, you can bet that my mind, fueled by the Zeigarnik Effect, will be ready and eager to press on.
So, the next time you find yourself stuck on a project or unsure of how to maintain consistent productivity, remember that sometimes, the best way to finish a task is to leave it intentionally incomplete. Your brain will thank you for it.
Happy AF with Phil Gerbyshak is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.